U-turn in sprinkler row over high rise student flats - News-content | Fire safety news events and jobs - info4fire

U-turn in sprinkler row over high rise student flats

17 August 2011

A fire service is celebrating after it managed to persuade developers to include sprinklers in a skyscraper built to accommodate students.

Originally, developers Watkin Jones said the planned Portsmouth Blade would not be fitted with a sprinkler system. The University of Portsmouth, which has commissioned the build, argued that ‘stringent evacuation measures’ would suffice.

They said that because the 33-storey Blade will be halls of residence and managed accommodation, it will fall under the category 'hotels and other use'. Under current building regulations, sprinklers have to be installed into new high rise blocks of flats exceeding 30 metres.

However after a row erupted between Hampshire Fire and Rescue service and the university over fire safety, it has been decided that the Blade will now be fitted with sprinklers.

"We listened to the valid points raised by the fire service and we have now decided to fit sprinklers in this iconic development, " a spokesman for Watkin Jones said.

It follows a meeting last week, where it looked as if there would be no adjustments to the design plans. In response, firefighters had said they would campaign ‘strongly’ to get the decision overturned.

Area manager for the fire service, Mick Crennell, said:  "This is a fantastic outcome and I commend Watkin Jones for their vision and foresight as well as their openness and commitment to make this building as safe as possible for all concerned. The fire service are able to assist in the design phase of any project in order to help balance the business imperative with occupants' safety and this project clearly demonstrates the benefits that can be gained.

"We have learned much from this experience and are committed to assisting developers and businesses during difficult economic times. We can do this by working together more closely at an early stage".
 


     
RSS feeds Print content Share

Add Comment

Tom Binkley
Common sense prevails.

Posted on 18/08/11 11:12.

Post Reply Post Reply Top Top
Richard
Thank you Watkins Jones / Portsmouth University.
The right decision - it is appropriate to protect our young brightest and best!
Hope this bizarre type of conflict can be avoided in other similar situations.

Posted on 07/09/11 15:42.

Post Reply Post Reply Top Top
Raymondo
The benefits of a sprinkler system are obvious. But it will be interesting to find out how a sprinkler system copes with a building housing students. I expect to hear about expensive water damage caused by 'accidental' operation in the future!

Posted on 07/09/11 15:42.

Post Reply Post Reply Top Top
Arthur Lewis
I think sprinklers are good but I think water mist systems are better. It appear to be cheaper, more responsive, less damage to property, less use of water, and applies only to the areas affected. There are some two drafts for development being considered by BSI, DD 8489-7:2011 (Tests and requirements for watermist systems for the protection of low Hazard occupancies)and DD 8489-1:2011 (Design and installation).

Posted on 02/09/11 14:43.

Post Reply Post Reply Top Top
Showing 4 results.

Related Content

jobs4securityandfire.com

Latest
jobs