Fire safety sprinkler row over high rise student flats - News-content | Fire safety news events and jobs - info4fire

Fire safety sprinkler row over high rise student flats

20 June 2011

A fire service has raised fire safety fears about a new 90 metres high tower block that will be used as student accommodation.

 
 The Blade: no sprinklers

The building, dubbed the ‘Blade,’ will house Portsmouth University students. At 33 storeys high, it will be one of the tallest structures in the city once it is completed.

However, senior firefighters from Hampshire Fire and Rescue Service have asked developers Watkin-Jones to consider installing a sprinkler system inside the skyscraper as students are ‘high risk’.

Deputy chief officer, Dave Curry, said: "We will be asking the university and the developers to consider including sprinklers in the design of the building to ensure the safety of the future occupants.

“This and other fire safety provisions are especially relevant when we know that the future occupants will be students - a known high risk group."

Under current building regulations, sprinklers have to be installed into new high rise blocks of flats exceeding 30 metres. However, because it will be halls of residence and managed accommodation, the tower falls under the category 'hotels and other use', claims Portsmouth university.

John Turner, pro-vice chancellor of the university, said:  “The building will not be fitted with a sprinkler system.  Stringent evacuation procedures will be in place in the new building.  In the event of a fire an automatic alarm is triggered and on detection of a confirmed fire, there is immediate evacuation of the building to a place of safety.”  

Last week, private residents of a 32-storey high housing block in Sheffield complained about the lack of a central fire alarm system. However, as the property is made up of self-contained flats each with a separate fire alarm system, a communal fire alarm is not required under building regulations. 
 


     
RSS feeds Print content Share

Add Comment

Glenn
The contention that students are a high risk isn’t borne out when referencing ADB, at least in the context of the measures to protect this purpose group.

I wonder how they come to the conclusion that this is a high risk? I recall in a previous life attending incidents at student accommodation, typically burnt toast and grill pan fires, but I can’t recall anything more serious. Of course the statistics may prove otherwise, will they issue a notice if built without sprinklers?

Posted on 28/06/11 10:01.

Post Reply Post Reply Top Top
Alan Taylor
Wrong decision not to install sprinklers Students are a high risk group. No doubt cost evaluated out by some jobsworth.

Posted on 04/07/11 17:20.

Post Reply Post Reply Top Top
John Crust
As the Chair of the University Fire Safety Officers group may I correct a statement in the story: the building is not under the control of the University; it is a private enterprise.

Students are a high risk group (irregular sleep patterns, alcohol and drugs) Accomodation run by Universities is generaly very well managed to control the risks.

As a group we would generaly support the use of sprinklers and are watching the outcome with interest.

Posted on 06/07/11 10:22.

Post Reply Post Reply Top Top
Tom Binkley
A fire in this 90 metre high building would be very serious in terms of Life Safety.
Stringent evacuation procedures will go out of the window once panic sets in.
I trust that all the decision makers will be named and held accountable if a fire sprinkler system is not installed?
Or will they hide behind committees and panels?
Either way I hope they have a strong belief in what they decide, their decision may come back to haunt them if they do not!

Posted on 06/07/11 10:22.

Post Reply Post Reply Top Top
Paul
This is a typical example of developers playing with the guidance to save their client money. Prior to the requirement to sprinkler dwelling buildings over 30m, developers wanted them in the 'residential dwelling' group. Now that the 'residential dwelling' group requires sprinklers, they have all made a sudden about-turn and are stating that they are in the 'residential other' group, but still wanting the benefit of certain areas of guidance regarding the 'residential dwelling' group. (i.e. Single stairs etc).

Posted on 13/07/11 12:09.

Post Reply Post Reply Top Top
Showing 5 results.

There are no results.
Related Content

jobs4securityandfire.com

Latest
jobs