False alarm charging could have ‘serious impact’ on fire safety - News-content | Fire safety news events and jobs - info4fire

False alarm charging could have ‘serious impact’ on fire safety

08 June 2011

Charging for fire and rescue services attending false alarms could have a serious impact on fire safety in England and Wales, a leading fire systems company has warned.

The warning from ADT Fire & Security follows a similar one made by the Fire Industry Association in February, when it said charging for alarms may have “serious repercussions” for fire safety.

A proposal contained in the Localism Bill currently going through parliament would give fire and rescue authorities the power to charge for attending false alarms at non-domestic premises.

If alarm receiving centres (ARCs) were landed with the charges, says ADT, they may refuse to pay and decide they no longer want to be involved in what may be seen as an inconsistent approach to policy implementation by individual brigades. The result could be a dilution of fire safety cover to UK business.

"In 2010, the Chief Fire Officers Association developed a policy for the reduction of false alarms and unwanted fire signals," said Peter Lackey, ADT’s fire product marketing manager. "However this has not been widely adopted by individual fire and rescue services. Instead, should the Localism Bill get the go ahead, we need to consider the serious impact in terms of fire safety if people decide to turn fire detection systems and alarms off, because they do not want to run the risk of a fine."

In March, the FIA made a submission to the House of Commons committee considering the Bill. It said that charging for attending false alarms was a bad idea, as systems would be disconnected and life safety threatened. If, however, the charging provision went ahead, then any charges should be levied on the building owner or manager (‘responsible person’) rather than ARCs. If that was not contractually possible, then action should be taken under the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order to force the responsible person to take remedial action.

The FIA submission went on to say that if charges were passed onto the ARC this could lead to “a disaster for fire safety”.

While acknowledging that false alarms and unwanted fire signals from some automatic fire detection systems can be a major problem, ADT believes this should be addressed by good system design, installation and maintenance.
 


     
RSS feeds Print content Share

Add Comment

Dave Sear
When you consider that commercial fire alarms are (in theory) designed and installed by trained and qualified people and domestic alarms are not, it is illogical to charge for false alarms where many lives may be at risk in a large building and not where 2 or 3 lives may be at risk. Current policy requires that the brigade are called in the event of a fire alarm sounding and so there is some degree of contradiction here. The whole policy of when the brigade is called needs to be looked at.

Posted on 10/06/11 14:53.

Post Reply Post Reply Top Top
Kevin Lowry
Dave says 'Current policy requires. . . ' well, change your policy then, Why should the nations fire and rescue services continue to waste time chasing after false alarms just because your organisation has a policy?
In large buildings 'where many lives may be at risk' the alarms should be maintained, a fire risk assessment in place, staff training, drills and any other measures identified by a FRA in place. btw, are you suggesting that your company should look at its policy for calling the fire

Posted on 06/07/11 10:22 in reply to Dave Sear.

Post Reply Post Reply Top Top
Showing 2 results.

There are no results.
Related Content

jobs4securityandfire.com

Latest
jobs