Building regulations on fire doors 'not fit for purpose', minister told - News-content | Fire safety news events and jobs - info4fire

Building regulations on fire doors 'not fit for purpose', minister told

19 April 2011

A steel glazing company is warning that glazed doors, screens and facades are being inspected and passed as fire resistant when in fact they offer little protection.

Denis Wright, chairman of Wrightstyle Limited, has written to the government minister responsible for building regulations, Andrew Stunell MP. In his letter, Mr Wright says there “seems to be an incomplete understanding and enforcement of fire specifications contained within the Approved Document B and the usage requirements of certification data.”

As an example of this, Mr Wright points to unlatched doors with untested or incompatible fire resistant glass being accepted as fire doors, despite the fact that they are “clearly not within the permissible limitations of their supplied test certification.

“We assume what is taking place is that fire safety officers are placing emphasis on the door’s performance as having, for example, 60 minutes of integrity, while paying insufficient attention to the fact that the door types, without an adequate safety latch mechanism or compatible glass, will certainly fail well within that period, allowing fire, heat or gases to pass through.

“There seems to be insufficient guidance to fire or building control officers or consultants as to what needs to be specifically checked on the submitted data. The building regulations simply state that test standards such as BS476 Part 22 or the applicable EN specification should be available. At no point do the regulations require further examination of that test certificate to determine whether or not the installed assembly matches the description in the certification.”

Mr Wright concludes: "On this specific issue, the current regulations are not fit for purpose."

In his reply, the minister said that guidance in Approved Document B includes appendix B on fire doors. “This clearly states,” said Mr Stunell, “that test evidence should be carefully checked to ensure that it its applicable to the complete installed assembly, and warns the reader that small differences in detail such as ironmongery can affect the rating.”
However, the minister acknowledged that “standards can be improved and that guidance may not always be fully adhered to,” and said he has “stressed the need to deliver even better levels of compliance in the future”.
 


     
RSS feeds Print content Share

Add Comment

Paul Evans
It is a well known fact the resistance of the smoke seal is 11 Minutes so no surprise in this "Revelation"

Posted on 20/04/11 15:23.

Post Reply Post Reply Top Top
David Sugden
I would agree with Mr Wright and Andrew Stunnel who both look for better levels of compliance with the guidance in ADB. Part of that guidance advises that performance of fire protection products and installations is best assured by using Third Party Certification of both products and installers and one would assume from his concern that Wrightstyle products are so Certified? This advice can be found in several places in ADB including the General Intruduction under Regulation 7 on page 5/6

Posted on 21/04/11 16:39.

Post Reply Post Reply Top Top
Arnold Tarling
I agree. Have just surveyed a new 10 storey property signed off by a major Authorised Inspector. Gaps of 29mm below 1 hour fire doors, 9mm stops to frames and not the 12mm used under test, 8mm gaps between door and frame at head. Windows - full height aluminium ordinary toughened glass - cedar cladding all round and to the slab. Had to tell my client not to purchase it. There is no way that there is 1 hour protection. Fire brigade served informal notice but cannot deal with cladding!

Posted on 27/04/11 12:43.

Post Reply Post Reply Top Top
Showing 3 results.

There are no results.
Related Content

jobs4securityandfire.com

Latest
jobs